A very odd occurrence here: Aliens running over busy main roads (which I cannot find on YouTube any more. How very suspicious.)  An odd reflection in the white house windows that looks like an alien head. You know the one I mean. George Bush is making an address, meanwhile behind him, this creepy alien head reflection is staring back at us from the window behind. Puppet Masters that they are.

Then there’s that guy who films a patch of his local woods for ages in infrared.  A Grey alien figure (or something) moves away to the right.

GRAY BUSHES. (Yes its a joke about George Bush and gray aliens)

It would be good if there was a well trusted central repository of knowledge for the UFO ‘community’ online, like Wikipedia for the beyond. I wonder. Spookipedia. Strangeipedia? It might help if there was a well reasoned argument for or against a given case’s reliability. Does anyone know of such a thing?

Videos and images of extremely dubious origin presents a problem in that genuine material gets all mixed up with the fakes. This is especially a problem when you have a really well engineered hoaxes. I could present a few here, but you know what I’m talking about. In the spirit of disclosure then, I suggest that the people from the military industrial complex who claim to know so much about all this, get together and vote or assess the various cases.  For example, “does this alien head look like what you saw”?

Over at MUFON, they do what any careful research organization does. They say to themselves when checking any case, “what does this potential genuine UFO contactee or whatever have to gain by disclosing their tale of interstellar shenanigans?”

You know the problem with that approach? If a UFO fanatic sees a real Grey alien in a patch of woods, whips out his night vision filter and video camera (which he always carries on his person, just in case you know) and starts shooting the woods, who in MUFON is going to believe him?  “How much did that dummy cost you buddy?”