Lt. Col Charles L Brown, US Airforce (Retired)
Lt. Col Charles L Brown is a retired military officer who worked for the predecessor of the famous project Blue Book; Project Grudge. In his testimony at the 2001 National Press Club conference hosted by Dr Steven Greer, he tells us that he flew bombers in Europe during the second World War before his posting at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. While at the base, he was assigned to analyze global UFO reports for 2 years.

He was sent UFO reports, which he analyzed so that he could offer official advice to air technical intelligence. In looking at these reports he says he became “convinced that there was substance to what was being reported”. Furthermore, these reports came from reputable military and civilian sources, like pilots, police officers and other credible people. The reports represented ground visuals, ground radar, and airborne radar confirmation of some of the sightings, all of which came from global sources.
Of course, Brown says that he is prepared to testify before congress that what he says is true.
As in the case of Mr Callahan, I we have to be honest and admit that this is not indication of extraterrestrial craft on the face of it, but could rather be advanced military technology. It is, however valuable testimony, because it lends credence to the concept of Ufology, which suffers from a certain stigma of being less than reputable.
Also bear in mind that Brown’s testimony here is a brief overview of what he did. He has not gone into any detail of any actual cases, which may provide someone with the ability to create a more informed personal opinion about WHAT these UFOs are. In the context of the subsequent disclosures, I think you’ll agree that this very question is answered fairly well!
One fact remains though, these are still the opinions of witnesses. As such, we can never know for sure what it is that they think they saw. For that reason, we must do what some judicial systems do and strive for an assesment based on the balance of probabilities. A weight of consistent testimony is therefor needed to reduce the odds of falacy and deception. Hopefully this aproach will bring a weight of probability to the table that matches the same level of certainty we have that the world is not actually a giant simulation and that we are not brains in a jar… hang on… How certain ios that? You get the idea though!










My Stargate Blog

